[Up] [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Ian of Noss is correct

Having completely accepted Ian of Noss interpretation of the Lord Lyon
clerk's letter and Ian's definition that only a born loser would take words
out of context.  The only near contemporary source, that names Zichmini as a
Prince is the Zeno narrative. If you accept Pohl's interpretation of
Zichmini as Henry some people quite reasonably do not. Henry would fall into
the 'Prince among men' category.

I pose the following questions:

Would calling him a 'Prince  make you a born loser?
Would calling Henry a 'Prince among men' would make you a born winner?
Who carved the Westford Knight?
Who built the Newport Tower?
What do they have to do with Zichmini?
What connection does Henry have with Zichmini?


[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@quarterman.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html