[Up] [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Sinclair Castle

AN offer to give the Old Man a helping hand has been rejected by Historic 
Scotland – and it has angered Wick conservationist Iain Sutherland.
He branded the quango as “bloody-minded” and “snobbish” in dismissing the 
offer to tidy up the ruined 12th-century keep which stands sentinel on the 
coast just south of Wick.
Mr Sutherland is chairman of the Wick Society but occasionally undertakes 
additional projects assisted by a group who share his interest in 
conservation. He wrote to Historic Scotland volunteering to clear up rubble 
which had fallen from the Old Man, as it is known locally, although its 
official title is the Castle of Old Wick.
However, while thanking Mr Sutherland for his “kind offer”, Historic 
Scotland added they would have to decline it.
Their regional services manager, Thomas Simpson, pointed out that the castle 
had been in the guardianship of the Scottish ministers and their predecessors 
since 1957 and it carried “clearly defined parameters in which we are allowed 
to operate and manage it”.
He went on to say that Historic Scotland was aware of the castle’s needs and 
further works had been programmed for the future which would involve careful 
handling of, as Mr Simpson put it, “what can only be described as a very 
difficult site”.
The reply brought a sharp reaction from Mr Sutherland, who took umbrage 
particularly at its tone. He stressed there would have been no question of 
his team carrying out any restoration or structural work.
He said: “In any case, we have considerable experience of such work over the 
years, as is evident at Whaligoe Steps, the castles of Sinclair and Girnigoe 
and the lighthouse at Auckengill.
“But all we intended doing in this case was a general tidy-up to make things 
more presentable for tourists who visit the site, out of the goodness of our 
hearts and at no expense to Historic Scotland. It would have made the keep 
more accessible to tourists and a bit more attractive.”
Mr Sutherland said that the response from Historic Scotland had not come as 
any surprise.
“They adopt the same bloody-minded and snobbish attitude to anyone who shows 
any initiative,” he claimed.
“They take the view that because they didn’t think of a project then it can’
t be worth doing. It’s their prerogative to turn things down but I reckon 
that we have demonstrated more building experience in the last thirty years 
than that collection of trosks.”
Mr Sutherland said it was a typical example of the way conservation was being 
conducted. The official attitude appeared to be that it was more attractive 
to leave buildings in a ruined state than to try and do something about them.
He observed: “They are only ruins because no-one maintains them.”
Mr Sutherland fumed: “There are signs up inviting holidaymakers to visit the 
site, but what do they find when they get there? A heap of rubble which is an 
embarrassment and sends them away with the wrong impression about the area’s 
“Historic Scotland have a lot to answer for. Our tourist industry is 
desperately trying to recover at the moment and we need all the visitors we 
can get.”
Mr Sutherland said that if the site was properly cleaned up and laid out the 
Old Man would be “immensely important” as an example of where Viking 
nobility once lived.
He said he had no intention of taking the matter further but gave the 
following pledge: “There is a lot of dissatisfaction about Historic Scotland 
and the way they discharge their duties, and when people decide to replace 
them they will have my full support.”
l Repairs have had to be carried out at an historic Caithness site following 
the slippage of stone on the archway at Sinclair Castle.
The work was authorised by the Clan Sin-clair Trust, which was gifted the 
ruined Sin-clair and Girnigoe castles by the Earl of Caithness.
The Earl of Caithness said yesterday: “It is sad the slippage happened, and 
it underlines just how fragile the castles are, but we are pleased the trust 
has been able to rush in and carry out the work which required scheduled 
monument consent.”
Meanwhile, the trust is hoping to hear next month whether its Heritage 
Lottery bid for £500,000 has been successful. The money represents about 50 
per cent of the estimated £1 million cost of preserving the 15th-century 
Girnigoe Castle.
Plans are also being drawn up to restore Sinclair Castle and develop other 
facilities at the site over the next few years, including the creation of 
study and Clan Sinclair centres and a nature reserve.   
<A HREF="mailto:editor@inverness-courier.co.uk">editor@nosn.co.uk</A>