[Up] [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: For Glen Cook, demise of the Templars???

Dear Sinclair,

According to your own most recent statements "John XXII was a greedy
heretic" and could not lawfully "Issue a Papal Bull or establish  legitamate
successors for the continuation of the Templars"... or something near those

I believe that the Templars changed their name to avoid persecution, and
that many of them went into countries where the would feel protected, like
Scotland and Portugal. I believe that they stayed in touch, much like each
diocese or parish within the Church, and that through perseverance their
ideals srayed alive until they could be
reunited. I am awaiting material by snail mail which will help me sort out
the facts and become more sure of exactly what transpired through those
years. I appreciate the comments and your  diligent


-----Original Message-----
From: Sinclair <labehotierre@wanadoo.fr>
To: sinclair@quarterman.org <sinclair@quarterman.org>
Date: Thursday, February 21, 2002 6:37 AM
Subject: Re: For Glen Cook, demise of the Templars???

>Dear Stanley,
>If you accept that the transformation is continuation would it not follow
>that only knights of the Papal/Portugal  order could claim any kind of
>legitimate decent from the Templars? Only the Knights, of which they are

[ Excess quotations omitted. ]