[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Bin Laden
No I do not 'Get it'
The Bill of Rights to the Constitution of the United States of America
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous
crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in
cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual
service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for
the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be
deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor
shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy
and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the
crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously
ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the
accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have
compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the
Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
Maybe the Constituion is wrong? Perhaps you throw away the principal that a
man has a right to a fair trial. Outlaw who has determined that? Even a
country that routinely judicially murders its own citizens demands 'due
process of law'. You only tear down your own rights by demanding less rights
Every man must stand equal before the law!
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Liley" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Bin Laden
Last time I checked Bin Laden was an "Outlaw". Outside the Law. Get it.
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, email@example.com
[ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html
- Bin Laden
- From: "John Liley" <firstname.lastname@example.org>