[Up] [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Paragenetic?



At 21:05 29/05/01 +1000, you wrote:
>Dear Neil
>My understanding is that the proportion is the same. It is just easier to 
>find male descendants if they haven't had a name change. We women accept 
>our husband's surnames, our daughters if they marry, do the same and we 
>can get lost. And if you have Sassenach blood from that marriage - oh 
>dear. ( I do.) :-}
>Regards
>Jean
>
>If you read the "Domesday Book" in conjunction with the "Sinclairs of 
>England" you will know that
  the Sinclairs were very much part of the "Sassenach" scene.  We have 
always had a European dimension
  which transcended national boundaries. Today, that dimension is 
global.  With our history, it behoves us
  to be catholic rather than parochial in our views.  Whilst we should be 
proud of our Scottish heritage, we
  should  be equally proud of our contribution to European culture and to 
the development of the World at large.

  The evidence is before our eyes.

  Niven


>>>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@quarterman.org
>>>[ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html
>>
>>
>>If you have Sinclair blood and are a McCullough, you have the best of both
>>genetic lines.
>
>
>
>
>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@quarterman.org
>[ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html


[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@quarterman.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html