[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Re: Re: Red mark on Rennes-le-Château's back wall
You referred to the person as flaky:
"John Millar is, to say the least, a bit 'flakey'."
If you want to argue for your right to do so, please do it somewhere else.
Ad hominem attacks are not permitted on this list.
If you want to refer to the person's *work*, then as a careful writer
I'm sure you can do so in an unambiguous manner that cannot easily be
interpreted as an attack on the person.
John S. Quarterman <email@example.com>
>If a simple statement casting reasonable doubt on the accuracy of any
>supposed proof coming from highly dunious sources is to be regarded as an
>'ad hominem' attack' -then what has ahhpened to a dispassionate search for
>truth? - also what has happened to the principle of Free Speech? Describing
>someone as a 'flakey' source is quite reasonable and, if asked I would plead
>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, firstname.lastname@example.org
>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, email@example.com
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html