Re: [rosslyntemplar] Fw: Rosslyn Chapel

["Neil Sinclair/Peggy Rintoul" <rinsin@globalserve.net>]

Gary; This is why professionals like Mr. Ramsay are needed. The pictures of
the partial excavations appear in Andew Sinclair book. Yes a detailed study
of the Rosslyn site would apparently be of value from an archelogist's
perspective.
Neil Sinclair Toronto PEI Argyll

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary M. Sinclair//Harwich, Ma. USA <sinclair@gis.net>
To: SinclairList <SINCLAIR@jump.net>
Date: 10 September, 1999 1:40 PM
Subject: Fw: [rosslyntemplar] Fw: Rosslyn Chapel


>Can anyone shed any light on the post from another list quoted below???  I
>try to follow happenings at the chapel and have heard nothing about any new
>endeavors as outlined below.  Could this be a confused re hashing of the
>original scans Andrew Sinclair commissioned?
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Gary M. Sinclair
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nukhet Serim <graham@superonline.com>
>To: Rosslyntemplar@onelist.com <Rosslyntemplar@onelist.com>
>Date: Friday, September 10, 1999 10:30 AM
>Subject: [rosslyntemplar] Fw: Rosslyn Chapel
>
>
>>From: graham@superonline.com (Nukhet Serim)
>>
>>Is this nonsense ?  Graham
>>
>>The radar scan was done at Rosslyn recently and revealed numerous hidden
>>vaults.Reflections registering as metal were found in several areas.  The
>>scans also indicated two flights of steps beneath the floor of the Chapel.
>>The work was organised by a man named Andrew Sinclair and he was allowed
to
>>raise stone slabs to reveal three steep steps to a vault below.  It was
>>small arched between two pillars but access to the main vaults beyond had
>>been sealed by a thick wall of stone masonry.
>>  The second stairway found exactly where the Reverend Thompson had
>>described it in 1897 was far deeper and filled with sand and stone.  The
>>excavation was stopped at this point and an attempt was made to drill
>>through the roof of the vault to lower an endoscope with a fibre optic
lead
>>to film the interior this proved impossible. It would appear that there
has
>>been as much attention given to the structure below ground as that above.
>>  If there is a follow up I will let you know but the papers are not a lot
>>interested in these parts
>
>
>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html
>

[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html