>I guess I was not trying to be romantic. (Why do we need to bash on each
>other on this list?)
We don't.
Everyone please respond to the content of postings.
No ad hominem comments about posters.
>Obviously Michael takes himself seriously and is pushing his claim, so he
>thereby forces one to take a position even if one thinks of it as romantic.
I find him quite entertaining without taking any position as to the validity
of his claims.
>Regards
>David Sinclair
John S. Quarterman <jsq@quarterman.org>
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@quarterman.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html