[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Folks, There seems to be some confusion about what I have asked to cease. The specific topic is whether one religion is better than another, along with the related subtopic of who or what is fundamental or liberal and which is better. These are fascinating subjects, and I for example could go on about them at great length (theology is another of my hobbies), but this is not the list for them. When religious topics of this nature come up on forums that are not primarily about them, what has happened usually happens: someone, and usually multiple parties, take offense. Now the issue isn't about who started the recent thread about Islam vs. Christianity, nor about any specific posting or poster in it. Some people took offense at one posting, others at another posting. The issue is that this list is not about that. There are many forums where whose religion is better can be debated ad nauseum. This list is about Sinclair-related matters. It has traditionally been very broad-minded in defining what is a Sinclair-related matter, and most likely will continue to be so. However, a simple rule of thumb is that if a string of postings doesn't mention the name Sinclair (or St. Clair or Sinkler or some other spelling), it's probably not Sinclair-related. If someone wants to cite a source written by a Sinclair about specifics of the Muslim faith, that is Sinclair-related. If someone wants to post about Christian faith as related to for example the First Crusade, in which we have reason to believe that at least one Sinclair participated, that's Sinclair-related. I hope these are enough examples to illustrate the idea. Not every posting has to specifically mention a Sinclair, but whenever possible, please do include such a mention. Some list members seem to be wondering if anyone has been removed from the list due to this issue. No, no one has. However, please remember that this list is my hobby, and I or Gary acting for me retain the right to remove anyone from the list at any time for any reason whatever or with no reason at all. Here's something else to think about: if you see messages on the list that you don't like, why not post messages about things you do want to see? For that matter, why not go ahead and do that anyway? Some of you may think that you do not know enough to post. But all of you have access to google, bookstores, and libraries. All of you have ancestors, many of them with interesting stories about them. All of you live somewhere, and most places have something interesting to say about them, often Sinclair-related. Most, probably all, of you have interesting stories of your own to tell. The list is what you, its members make of it. The list is not television; we are not here to be passively entertained. The list only has content when its members post content. The more each of you post, the more likely the list will have content that you and the rest of us find interesting and enjoyable. John S. Quarterman <jsq@quarterman.org> [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@quarterman.org [ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html