[an error occurred while processing this directive]
labehotierre@wanadoo.fr queries: > Were these Guild charters as opposed to Freemason documents? GAC: If you are referring to the Schaw Statutes, clearly it was at least a Guild document. Schaw is referenced as Master of the Kings Works. I do not believe that it referred to Freemasonry as practised today. Others disagree. labehotierre: When you refer > to "governance of the Craft. " this does not > refer, I presume to the Freemason craft but to "craft of stone masonry and > these other crafts and trades was that stones masons had another level of > organisation " > It refers to the craft of stone masonry. Some argue that esoteric Freemasonry was a part of the craft of stone masonry. This view is set out in Mr. Wallace-Murphy's Books and the Hiram Key. Was > William Master of a Guild craft as opposed to a Freemason order? Ah, that's the question. Some argue without credible proof of a Masonic order dating to the Essenes; because the Essenes were an initiate society and Freemasonry is an initiate society, Freemasonry must be derived from the Essenes. You may suspect that I do not accept that argument. If William was Master, the only evidence of leadership that I've seen is of a guild craft of masons, and not a Masonic order with the esoteric teachings as later found. Is it > possible for you to disclose the Freemason charter? GAC: I'm not sure of which charter you speak. If you are speaking of a modern document, each Grand Lodge has its own constitution which may be disclosed. or are the Schaw > Statutes. I do not have a copy of the Schaw Statutes at least immediately at hand > > When does the "Scottish Rite" first appear? > GAC: 1801 in Charleston, South Carolina. Does the Mother Lodge of > Scotland, Lodge Mother Kilwinning, No.0, have any > authority over other Lodges in Scotland or abroad? GAC: No. > labehotierre: Normally hereditary positions are an English inventions, > Scots elected their chiefs. > GAC: Assuming this is a correct assertion (without beginning the tanistry discussion), this is not a chief. I view it more as a patron. Glen Cook