[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Wanda Sinclair wrote "How long after the War of 1066, did it take for the Normans & Saxon to fully merge as Englishman?" John wrote "in the time of Richard II of England and Robert II of Scotland" I date Englishness (Is that a word?) to Magna Carta. What a question! There was a Saxon knight who swore, To slay his Norman foe, There was a Norman knight who swore, The Saxon he would show, What hatred he did have at mind - The Saxon harboured hate in kind. And thus from crib to manhood did, Their bloodfeud spring and grow. .............. "They learned to take intolerance, And set that taint aside, That all that parts two peoples is, Their prejudice and pride. And though they valiant, lost dear life, They're free of pointless, putrid strife, I see they sit and smile and sing, And do so side by side Fragment of poem by A. Austin The Anglo-Saxon Chronicles speak of the problems as late as 1189 AD >From 1066 to 1154 four kings ruled. The Domesday Book the forests were extended, the Exchequer was founded and a start was made on the Tower of London. The Norman aristocracy came to prominence. This was the case when William the Conqueror died. His eldest son, Robert, became Duke of Normandy, while the next youngest, William Rufus, became king of England. his younger brother Henry became king on William II's death. Henry captured and imprisoned The Duke of Normandy, Henry's son died, he nominated Matilda as his heir. She was denied the throne by her cousin, Henry's nephew, Stephen. The result civil war. Matilda married Geoffrey Plantagenet of Anjou, who took control of Normandy. The duchy and England were estranged. A compromise was eventually reached whereby the son of Matilda and Geoffrey would be heir to the English crown, while Stephen's son would inherit his baronial lands. All this meant that in 1154 Henry II became king. He was the first undisputed King in over 100 years Thomas of London or better know to us as Thomas a Becket. Studied both in London and Paris. He was appointed chancellor of England by Henry II, He was famed for the luxury and magnificence of his life-style. Henry nominated him Archbishop of Canterbury. He was ordained a priest the day before his consecration.. He disagreed with the King over clerical and Church rights, really money and power. Thomas was the son of a Norman knight and a Saxon woman. Richard I Coeur de Lion (the Lionhearted) at the time of the third Crusade was very much a Norman.. He died in France during a minor siege against a rebellious baron. By the time of his death, Richard had recovered all his lands. His success was short-lived. In 1199 his brother John became king and Philippe successfully invaded Normandy. By 1203, John had retreated to England, losing his French lands of Normandy and Anjou by 1205. He is buried in Rouen. He seldom saw England Richard and his brother John were Angivins they were really Normans. In it really with the historically vilified John Lackland who died in 1216 that England contained Englishmen. John was an able administrator interested in law Crushing taxes, excommunication by the Pope in 1209 and unsuccessful in his attempts to recover his French possessions made him unpopular. Many of his barons rebelled and in June 1215 they forced the King to sign a peace treaty (Magna Carta) accepting their reforms. As a peace treaty Magna Carta was a failure and the rebels invited Louis of France to become their king. When John died in 1216 England was in the grip of civil war. But The English Nation had been welded together. Much better answers can be obtained by writting to; Rachel Koopmans Medieval Institute 715 Hesburgh Library University of Notre Dame Notre Dame IN 46556 koopmans.1@nd.edu G.A. Loud School of History, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K. Tel. 0113-2333601 (direct line) FAX 0113-2342759 g.a.loud@leeds.ac.uk Sinclair ----- Original Message ----- From: "John S. Quarterman" <jsq@quarterman.org> To: <sinclair@quarterman.org> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 6:01 AM Subject: Re: Norman & Saxon > >How long after the War of 1066, did it take for the Normans & Saxon to > >fully merge as Englishman? > > One could argue that that didn't happen until after the Black Plague > of 1348, when English became the language of the law courts. [ Excess quotations omitted. ] [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@quarterman.org [ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html