[an error occurred while processing this directive]
A feudal title is a territorial dignity which passes with the ownership of the lands to which it is attached; a peerage title is a personal dignity which will pass, if it is not a life peerage, according to the "remainder" or "destination" specified at the time of its creation. There is a clear distinction there are titles whose classification may be obscure or contentious. Baron was a feudal territorial dignity, not personal, not a peerage title feudal titles are universally misused. The words; barony, lordship, manor, honour and nobility also suffer. The feudal system was to be found throughout Western Europe from about 1000 AD, it differed from region to region, those differences led to different connotations of various terms in different jurisdictions. The use of Latin as the sole cross border European language tended to remove in translation some of the nuances. In formal Latin baro means dunce or fool. In Vulgar Latin baro means slave or servant, in a great household. The feudal system required the theories of land ownership, hereditary rights and of service, a "baron" was one on whom a superior relied. The superior was the higher man and vassal took an oath of fealty. The feudal system allowed the baron to hold land as a tenant-in-chief of his "prince". Prince has a wide range of meanings. In feudal terms it is used to denote a ruler who holds his lands of no one. He need not be a king; he could be a bishop; the essence is that he is sovereign in his principality. Here is where the claims for our Henry as a prince falls. Henry always owed his allegiance to someone, at one time to two Kings. In the early feudal times the king's barons, his tenants-in-chief, to had their own barons through a process of subinfeudation. The practice was stopped in England by King Edward I (King 1272-1307). In Scotland it continued unabated until the Union of the Crowns. In England the kings ruled in council, first summoning some of the greater barons (i.e. the more powerful barons) to attend and advise them, and then, while retaining the Privy Council, extending the principle to bring to their Parliament larger numbers of barons, together with the representatives of the church and the boroughs and the Knights of the Shires. The concept of peerage and its subsequent development was haphazard and irrational. Peerage itself has never been defined by the Committee for Privileges, (the responsible agency for the organization of the British Peerage in Parliament.) Those barons who first attended the Norman kings in council came as territorial magnates holding their lands of the king in accordance with a loosely hereditary system, but if the barony, which was the lands, passed to another, the rank of baron and the privileges dependent on it passed also. Such barons were and are Barons by Tenure. After the idea of the Peerage found it's place in England, it was argued that those feudal barons, Barons by Tenure, who had been summoned to the early Parliaments were ipso facto peers, Barons by Writ (Barons summoned by a king). Kings created new peers of landless men they considered would make valuable contributions to their government, and these became Barons by Patent. Subsequently, Letters Patent became the usual way to create new peers or to promote existing ones. In Scotland, it was quite impossible to distinguish clearly between Barons who were the equivalent of peers and those who were simply Barons by Tenure, (land holders). Until the statute of 1428, which recognized the burden carried by those poorer Barons with the smaller estates, all were expected to attend Parliament, but thereafter they were classified either as Greater Barons, the "Lords of Parliament," or as Lesser Barons, who could, but need not, attend Parliament. (The Scots Parliament was unicarmel and consisted of the Prelates, the Barons and the Burgesses (Earls sitting as Barons, i.e. as those holding their lands in baroniam.) But despite the importance of land and the significance of the barony, a Baron in Scotland did not necessarily hold a territorial barony. Feudal Law gives the title of Baron to all those who hold the absolute jurisdiction which is carried by the grant of furca et fossa - the power to hang men, and to drown women, found guilty of capital offences by a baronial court. "Canlige suspectos semper habitos". Sinclair ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rika and Kevin" <kevrik@shaka.com> To: <sinclair@quarterman.org> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:42 AM Subject: Re: Book: The History of the Sinclair Family in Europe and America Leonard's undertaking truly > remarkable. > Take care, Kevin > > [ Excess quotations omitted. ] [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@quarterman.org [ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html