[an error occurred while processing this directive]
A family history springs different sources of information. One is birth and death records, deeds, wills, and family records. Military records are useful. There usually are not existing written records of daily life, these areas have to be filled in by guesses based on the extant records. We must be careful not to confuse our historical musings with history. Because a certain thing happened to one person it does not mean that it happened to another or that we should ascribe it to another. Recently on this list the statement that “it has been recorded” without any reference. The particular reference, when it was produced was to Sir James Douglas. The assumption was then made that if it happened to the leader it happened to his followers, notably Sir William Sinclair. That is assumption not history. A statement was made "when the Templars were excommunicated." Had I missed something? Quickly I wrote to Wallace-Murphy the acknowledged expert on Templar matters. His new book not yet in print is a cracker. He replied " The order was suppressed, not excommunicated. While various individuals within the order, Jaques de Molay among them, paid the price usually reserved for heretics and despite the accusations of heresy made at the instigation of Philip le Bel, the order as a whole was not officially declared as heretical, although many members in France." Once before I took umbrage at the ‘Fact’ that there were 9 Sinclair knights at Hastings. Only one is recorded. A explanation was offered. The explanation fell far short of historical method. Family names are recent in invention. Names were territorial or occupational. The records of genealogy that Lenna and others keep so meticulous together with the physical evidence are the backbone of historical writings. The Celts had been combatants for centuries. They harassed Greece and Rome. The Vikings, which make up the half of Gaelic blood, were one of the most blood thirsty bands of pirates in history. The fortunes of the clans and their chiefs was based on booty from neighbouring lands. We live in a world ruled by fictions of every kind -- mass merchandising, advertising, politics conducted as a branch of advertising, the instant translation of science and technology into popular imagery, the increasing blurring and intermingling of identities within the realm of consumer goods, the pre-empting of any free or original imaginative response to experience by the television screen. We live inside an enormous novel.. The fiction is already here. History is not a straight line. Sinclairs do not stand at the cutting edge of it as representatives for all mankind. We believe in the future as if it were a religion; we believe that there is nothing we cannot accomplish, that solutions wait somewhere for all problems, like brides. Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness, with which fills more than half our history we should not omit them. It would be more consistent if we told the whole story, separating our guesses form available records. That is history Sinclair [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@quarterman.org [ To get off or on the list, see http://sinclair.quarterman.org/list.html