| 
 John Q, 
  
I think you've done great--sticking the instructions on every 
page!  Maybe put the line that says for subscription, unsub, etc. at the 
top of the page instead of the bottom--otherwise, I don't see how you could make 
it any clearer! 
  
Having said that, I would interested in 
connecting with anyone who has information about or is a descendant of the 
following: 
  
1) Colin Sinclair who died in Richmond or 
Robeson County, North Carolina between 1790-1800. 
2) Elias Sinclair who was taxed in Richmond 
County, NC in 1793. 
3) John Sinclair taxed in 
Bladen County, NC in 1784 and in the Bladen, NC census of 1790. 
  
Thanks to all! 
  
Karen M 
    [ This is the 
    Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net. [ For more 
    information, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html -------
  Return-Path: 
    <jsq@mids.org> Received: from 
    mail.jump.net by mail11.jump.net (mail.jump.net [207.8.124.18]) 
    (8.9.0/jump.1.11) id HAA17407;  for <sinclair@majordomo.jump.net> 
    Tue, 2 Mar 1999 07:10:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from akira.aus.us.mids.org 
    by mail.jump.net (akira.aus.us.mids.org [38.159.59.251]) 
    (8.9.1/jump.1.11) id HAA07313;  for <sinclair@jump.net> Tue, 2 Mar 1999 
    07:10:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from mids.org (localhost 
    [127.0.0.1]) by akira.aus.us.mids.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id 
    HAA17012 for <sinclair@jump.net>; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 
    07:10:34 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199903021310.HAA17012@akira.aus.us.mids.org> From: 
    "John S. Quarterman" <jsq@mids.org> To: sinclair@jump.net In-reply-to: Your 
    message of "Tue, 02 Mar 1999 06:32:44 
    CST."              
    <199903021232.GAA13445@akira.aus.us.mids.org">199903021232.GAA13445@akira.aus.us.mids.org> 
     Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 07:10:34 -0600 Sender: jsq@mids.org
  >I do not want to 
    remove myself from this list.  However, I have had 
    difficulty >removing myself from other lists that weren't what I 
    thought they were.  My >experience may not apply to this 
    list.
  It applies, as one among several related 
    problems.
  >Sometimes when we subscribe to a list, the server or 
    'thing-ma-bob' (precise >computer terminology) that sorts and sends us 
    our mail actually has a >different address than what we see.  
    Periodically the computer techie or guru >or system administrator 
    makes a subtle change in that technical address.  The
  Permit me 
    to clarify here that I believe you're referring to the 
    system administrator with the subscriber's ISP or company.  I don't 
    change anybody's address on the list without asking.
  >list 
    keeps sending the subscriber info which the 'thing-ma-bob' recognizes 
    as >no longer the current address but is smart enough to internally 
    change the >address so the subscriber keeps getting mail without 
    knowing that the subtle >difference even exists.  The problem 
    arises when the subscriber attempts to >unsubscribe and sends the 
    appropriate message to the list.  The list 'thing- >ma-bob' can't 
    find the subscriber's internal numeric address on its list.  
    The >gist of this long winded explanation is that it often takes some 
    searching >through all that gobble-do-gook at the end of your message 
    to determine how >the list recognizes the subscriber and to mail the 
    request to unsubscribe with >an explanation to that effect.
  We 
    do sometimes see that kind of problem.  It's usually fairly easy to 
    fix.
  We also sometimes see the related phenomenon when a subscriber 
    wants to change an address for this or another reason.  The only 
    tricky part is that the list owner (me, in this case) can't necessarily 
    tell which address the list subscriber wants to use to subscribe, so 
    the subscriber has to say which.  The easiest way to say which is 
    simply to unsubscribe with the old address and resubscribe with the new 
    one.
  >I am quite confident that I have confused and confounded as 
    many readers as >possible.  It was not my intent,  
    but......maybe I have helped somebody.  
  The kind of problem 
    that I was noting was when someone simply doesn't follow the instructions 
    at all.  I really don't know how to make the instructions more 
    obvious for this list.  I'm already cluttering up every message with 
    them.  Since even that apparently isn't sufficient, I'm thinking of 
    trimming the appended headers and footers to reduce the 
    clutter.
  If anybody does think of a better idea, please let me 
    know. In the meantime, back to our regularly scheduled 
    genealogizing and the like.
  >Connie in Missouri
  Good to 
    hear from you.
  John [ [ This is the Sinclair family discussion 
    list, sinclair@jump.net. [ For 
    subscription, unusubscription, or other instructions, see [  http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html [ 
    or send mail to majordomo@jump.net 
    with this single line in the body: [  info sinclair [ [ To 
    unsubscribe, send a message like 
    this: [ [           
    To: majordomo@jump.net [ [           
    unsubscribe sinclair [
  
 |