[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: testing a new discussion site idea-please read this
Hello Donald, :)
Don't worry - I haven't given up! Is genealogy something you *can* easily
give up? :):)
But I do have a question for you! Andrew Sinclair and Charlotte Calder
have always been listed (by us at least) as having the following children...
Elizabeth (Betsy)?? Nov 57
David 30 Sep 59
George - 16 Jul 61
James 17 may 63
John 16 Apr 65
Andrew (my ggrandfather) 23 May 67
Barbara 21 Jan 70
Charlotte 18 April 72
Donald 4 April 74
Emmie (Amelia) 25 May 76
Now this is what I've always accepted. However, just recently I obtained a
copy of the 1891 Census and they list Amelia as a GRANDDAUGHTER!!!! Living
in the house, along with Charlotte and several other strangers, but
Charlotte is listed as a daughter and Amelia as a granddaughter. Have you
heard this before? Do you have any thoughts on it? I wondered if perhaps
she really was a granddaughter and the child of Betsy - perhaps outside
marriage? Everything else seems to be right and her age is correct...
Would love to hear your thoughts on this... and if you don't have a copy of
this entry I'd be happy to either scan it and email it or mail you over a
At 06:37 PM 5/22/99 -0400, you wrote:
> Don't give up, I'm still looking, it's got to be
>somewhere in my files. You shall be notified immediately it comes to the fore.
> All the best, Donald.
>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, email@example.com.
>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, firstname.lastname@example.org.
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html