Dear All,
Can anyone provide some detail to the communication I received?
Regards
Bruce
RE:Oak Island = GUNN
Bruce,
Thanx for the reply. A little more info to add to the pile. I've come
to understand that the Sinclairs and Gunns were close, a family
relationship would explain alot of that. Would that be a sister of
Henry's who married a Gunn ??? I have also read that the Gunns were
considered the "crowners" of Caithness (which is what the broach
signifies) and the Sinclairs were unable to rule without their
consent. Why this was so I have not been able to determine for sure.
Speculation that Gunn was an ancient Pictish King, the original
inhabitants of the land... or that a Gunn married a woman who was the
daughter of the mormaer of Caithness. I haven't figured out what a
mormaer is yet.... The Gunns were also possibly a sea-power to reckon
with in that area.... So what I want to know is who or what gave them
the position to determine who rules the lands of Caithness ???
I have been most interested in the Westford Knight long before I came
to realize he was a Gunn clan member, as it was a piece of the puzzle
of the POS and Templar mysteries. I am most interested to know if he
was a Templar ??? Is the cloak Templar style ??? What says Templar
about it ??? I have also noticed that at his neckline would appear to
be a symbol of a dove, which I have come to understand is a symbol of
the POS, or guardians of the Holy Grail. But I have read no mention
of that in any articles of the Westford Knight.
The recent find of the Gunn coat of arms on Oak Island has grabbed my
attention though. Unlike the Westford Knight which would be a
memorial to a fallen comrade, why was the Gunn coat of arms punch
marked into the rocks and not Sinclairs', if it was his
expedition ???
All The Best,
Kathleen
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html