[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Rory, >That you have accomplished so much for all of us is not in doubt. I merely attempt to emulate your lead. >That someone feels upset enough with another member of the list to send >(anonymous? or untraceable?) messages is not a happy outcome. >My first instinct is to find out the details but I realize that may not be >possible so I will revert to the workings of my poor brain. My first instinct is to steer clear of the problem. However, it appears that I cannot do so. >I suspect that whoever is sending "hidden threats" feels slighted by the >'victim' in the present matter and has, foolishly, up the ante. Unfortunately, it appears to be more than a single person. >I quite agree with your image of people meeting in your living room and then >going outside to fight only to expect to return and carry on normally in >spite of this undercurrent of ill will is not a Good Thing. >But a summary execution (excommunication actually) without a warning is not >my nature although I will bow to the majority vote here if they vote >otherwise. I have had various offlist communications with various parties, although I don't know whether any of them are the offenders. >My inclination is to say that, because I do not know what provoked the >original 'threat' and that therefore there may be an earlier agenda that >none of us is particularly aware of, that both involved may to a certain >extent be "at fault" and that warnings in front of sanctions are always >best that therefore, that I therefore would adopt Iain Lairds solution of >yellow-carding the offenders saying: >" you have been found out and found lacking --- go and sin no more and if >you do, yer outta here!" I think that's what I just did with my previous message. >Ultimately John, it is your undertaking that has made this such an exciting >enterprise to which to belong. I would not like to see this fact conflated >with bad behaviour of others. Your comfort level is critical - thank you >for asking us --- but it is your decision. Thanks. More on this in a few days, after reviewing the various comments and talking to some people. >Yours Aye, >The rambling fool >Rory in Toronto. John [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org [ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html