>I've got no problem with helping on a manual subs cribe!
Great. With you, me, and Gary doing it, it should work without too much
delay.
> Anything to get rid of spammers.
Right.
> By the way - I parsed the headers and reported him to spamcop!
As in abuse.net? Good idea.
>Margaret
John
>At 03:42 AM 7/06/00, you wrote:
>> >In a message dated 6/6/2000 7:16:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>> >www.PhantomBlue@learn.com writes:
>> >
>> ><< EASIEST WAY TO MAKE MONEY EVER >>
>> >
>> >How did this get in the sinclair discussion net????????/
>>
>>The spammer joined the list first.
>>
>>Margaret (milamba) has already removed the spammer from the list.
>>
>>To prevent this is is why I had previously had the list set up to
>>require confirmation from the person. That confirmation would have
>>failed in this case and prevented this problem.
>>
>>However, I turned off that feature a few weeks ago because of
>>complaints that it was to hard to use. So at this point anyone can
>>join. The problem with that is what you have observed: even
>>spammers can join.
>>
>>A third possibility is to go to manual confirmation of new list members.
>>I don't like it, because people will complain about delays in getting on,
>>but I'm willing to do it if Margaret and Gary are willing to assist.
>>
>>John
>>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
>>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>
>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html