[an error occurred while processing this directive]
In my papers I have come across an article written by a descendant of Captain Francis Sinclair The author's great grandmother was Elizabeth McHutchesonSinclair who married Captain Francis Sinclair. There is also a short piece about Captain Thomas Gay who married a Jane Sinclair by whom he had five children: George, Francis, Elizabeth, Charles and Alice - all born in New Zealand with the exception of Alice who was born in Ni'ihau. By a previous marriage Captain Gay had two sons: James and Thomas. Captain Francis Sinclair lived at "The Pines" on Mount Eden in Auckland. He believed he was next of kin to the Earl of Caithness who died in 1883 but, as no Earl of Caithness died in that year, he must have got his facts wrong. James II, 52nd Earl of Caithness died in New York in 1881. His body was returned to Scotland and was buried in the Royal Chapel, Holyrood, Edinburgh, Scotland. He was succeeded by his son George Philips Alexander who became the 53rd Earl of Caithness (15th of the Sinclair line) On his death in 1889 the Earldom passed to the Durran Branch of the family. From "The St Clairs of the Isles" which was written in Auckland and published there in 1898 by Roland St Clair, he makes no mention of any Francis Sinclair with a legitimate claim to the Earldom of Caithness and he and Captain Sinclair were resident in Auckland at the material time. It is inconceivable that they didn't know of each other's existence. True, Francis is not an uncommon name with the Sinclairs. We find it in the family tree of the Sinclairs of Brabsterdorran and of the Sinclairs of Stirkoke but neither of those branches ever held the Earldom of Caithness. In the article under discussion, it is stated that the 'position' of the Earldom was 'advertised' in Scottish and English newspapers but that Francis Sinclair decided not to take up the title because he had no children and, having inspected Estates in Aberdeenshire and the ruined Castle of Dunbeath , he believed he was better off in New Zealand - which may well have been true at the time. His claim, however, would seem to be without foundation. Captain Francis Sinclair, like many other Sinclairs, had had a distinguished career in the Royal Navy. If any Sinclair in NZ would like a copy of the article of 8 pages they should let me have their full postal address, I'll put it in the post for them. It may not be accurate in regard to Francis Sinclair's claim to the Earldom but it gives us a wonderful insight into life in New Zealand at the end of the 19th Century when there were already over 1,000 Sinclair residents out of a total population of 650,000 Europeans with 50,000 indigenous Maori. Niven Sinclair [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org [ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html