>I am truly glad Julie chose to stay. However, I'm not sure I will. I have
>been out of the office since last Wednesday. It's now Tuesday of the
>following week. I had 587 messages when I checked this account. Of these,
>500 were from Julie's email loop. Of the other 87, approximately 20 were
>apologetic to Julie for the harsh tone. Her most vocal attacker, who thinks
>very highly of her own wit and who caused many of the loop messages, has yet
>to apologize. I am appalled that so many of us were hateful and stupid. I
>can be hateful with the best but this is truly ridiculous. I am embarrassed
>by the lack of breeding exhibited by a large majority on this list. Many of
>us should be ashamed. However, I believe only a few of us are.
Actually, there were perhaps a dozen people who reacted shall we say hastily
to Julie's vacation messages. That's out of a current headcount of 222.
Doesn't look like a majority to me.
Are we now to criticise some of those who overreacted for not following
up in a politically correct manner?
Wouldn't it be better to just call the whole incident closed and move on?
>Darwin
John
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html