[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Lena, I think the issue is that Lief was not the first...North American schools tend to teach that Columbus discovered America - even when they refer to Leif's voyages to America... The issue centres around "established" thought that Henry Sinclair could not have voyaged to Nova Scotia in 1398 because Columbus was the first in America and Champlain and de Monts in Nova Scotia...any evidence of other pre-Columbian European contact strengthens the possibility - mostly because the naysayers say that no-one made contact before Columbus... Now they are admitting that Leif did too - but no one else in between... There is no proof that Henry did not make the voyage but there is now much proof that the naysayers are wrong...it's an extremely minor victory...but it counts :)... The other issue would be that this runestone apparently pre-dates Lief...It also spawns responses such as Darwin's which indicate that Australian aboriginals beat Lief by millenia...then there was the recent posting about 3000 year old runes in Ontario (I have not had time to search the article yet...btw, could someone send me a url or fax a copy to 902 421 0080 please please please)... There's nothing wrong with believing what you were taught in school...but maybe what you were taught in Sweden is only slightly less incorrect than what we were taught in North America... This runestaone is more evidence that neither Columbus nor Lief "discovered" America... Personally, I don't think anyone discovered America...I think that it's always been here...I do a lot of sailing of old wooden schooners and boats aren't really all that complicated... And I wouldn't say that I am "amazed" by this article...I'm just extremely happy to have some more solid archeological (rather than speculative) evidence that my local government is as open-minded as the Inquisition or Stalin...it helps when I talk to them about these matters... but another extremely minor victory I assure you... rob [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org [ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html