[an error occurred while processing this directive]
this is why I love this list... I sincerely appreciate the archeologist perspective but I have been a bit leary of officials since I met my first teacher...my history teachers drove me nuts - and I'm more than certain I returned the favor... I don;t believe every word I see in print - I have a sometimes public profile and I have been misquoted and libelled more times that I can count - I have rarely seen an accurate portrayal of my motives - which many actively question...History is nothing but the perspective of the person who wrote it given the information they have access to... There has been next to no real archeology at any of the Sinclair sites in Nova Scotia - the provincial government says it never happened and won't spend a cent on it because the person in charge puts her money into Louisbourg and her other existing pet projects that generate revenue from French tourists... Their position is Henry never came here so why even think about it - then they spend $1.5 million on a site dedicated to a fictional Acadian character created by Longfellow...and PEI spends almost $5 million a year on Anne of friggin Green Gables...The only "site" that they have is the author's home and the pro shop on the Green Gables golf course... I wouldn't be surprised if there are lots more proven examples of pre-columbian exploration kicking about in private hands or the hands of the government - one they chose to ignore is actually on display in a Yarmouth Nova Scotia Museum - a stone carved by Lief Erikson in the year 1007 which has been intrepeted to read "Lief to Eric raises (this monument)"...the stone was found near Yarmouth in 1812... Oak Island is the biggest demonstration of Government stupidity - the bureaucrat responsible for Culture and Heritage told me that "there is nothing of archeological value on Oak Island or at New Ross"...one interested professional archeologist inside the department told me - she's full of shit... So there you go...who to believe...well in the absence of any archeological study I prefer to keep an open mind... I have just come home from a three hour search for the site I described yesterday - 5 minutes from the centre of Halifax...it dwarfs the New Ross Site - four foot high walls of a major building still exist, a four hundred foot section of defensive wall, another smaller building, stone steps and much more - a worthy I was questing with failed to find any recognizeable geometry or markings but was over the top with excitement none-the-less...we will return to the site on Saturday to digitally photograph it and I will try to send them to John to post... I have no actually knowlege of archeology - it is my Sinclair interests which are drawing me into the field (ha) and without such impetus - I probably wouldn't have cared much about your informative notes on aboriginal sites in North America... I don't think that establishing communications between Europeans and the aboriginals means that the aboriginals didn't build these sites...but there may have been influences...and I am certainly not saying that the aboriginals were stupid and had no abilities - Europeans certainly learned from this contact as well - as the Corn and Aloe carvings in Rosslyn indicate... So I do want to say something about your informative notes: I learned much from them that I didn't know... and that's always a good thing... so thank you... rob [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org [ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html