Geez..not "Rediculous". Small, miunte or whatever...
"John S. Quarterman" wrote:
>
> >There are huge sites throughout the Mid-West and the Mississippi River
> >Valley that make this site (Stonehenge 2) look ridiculous. We are talking
> >about mounds that are hundreds of feet high and cover acres.
>
> There are lots of smaller mounds in the southeast, too, and of course when
> you get to Mexico you have huge pyramids and cities dating way back.
>
> >My point is, there is lots of evidence for Indians to have constructed this
> >site and NONE for Europeans, Mynoans, Egyptians, etc. Remember, European
> >descendants wrote that description including the reference to 'Baal.'
>
> And the inscribed ledge in Westport, Mass., has been interpreted in a
> variety of ways depending on who happened to be looking at it in any
> particular quarter century.
>
> >I just don't believe that Europeans had to rush over here and build this
> >structure. I think the people who were already here had the knowledge and
> >technology to do so just like the British Isles aboriginal population had to
> >build Stonehenge.
>
> However, this also doesn't rule out the possibility that there was early
> traffic between the continents, although it would of course be good to
> see some evidence for it before assuming such traffic as the source of
> any given artifact.
>
> John S. Quarterman <jsq@mids.org>
> [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
> [ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@mids.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html