>Last night as I was looking at material that Niven had sent and
>realized that he didn't have one of the Henrys that I have. I checked
>Pete's book again and found that he has one more generation than Niven.
>Now this might be a case of (1) Niven dropped a generation (2) Pete made
>a mistake (3) Pete stuck a brother in as a generation which might be
>correct if he was Baron for part of a year but maybe he wasn't. If this
>is wrong than our numbering is getting closer. Will be sending this off
>by mail to Niven soon.
Pete had one generation among the Barons of Roslin and Earls of Orkney
that he at one time listed as a brother and at another as a son.
I'm not entirely sure which one, but that may be what you've found.
Which Henry did you notice?
> Can't send it by E-mail because my neat little
>columns get scrambled. But I'm getting there.
GEDCOM is the best format for mailing to researchers,
since most genealogical programs can read it
and convert it into human-readable format.
>Laurel
John
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net.
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html