[an error occurred while processing this directive]
GOOD - Now that's real documentation! Is there a date for the church? Laurel -----Original Message----- From: Jean Haddow <jean@hadpad.demon.co.uk> To: sinclair@jump.net <sinclair@jump.net> Date: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 3:08 PM Subject: Re: Baptist Religion--A hint? > >In message <010d01bea094$f9065ba0$7cf382d0@laurelfe>, Spirit One Email ><laurel@spiritone.com> writes >> >>Jean, >> Do you have more information on this first Baptist Church in northern >>Scotland? Baptists have a custom, as do other churches, of naming the first >>church built in each city "First Baptist Church". So we might wonder >>whether it was one of these namings instead of really being the first church >>built in northern Scotland. But certainly, somwhere there had to be a first >>Baptist church built. >> I wonder about a "Sinclair" building it. Doesn't that usually mean that >>this person provided the funds? But weren't the Sinclair Earls the only ones >>that would have had enough money to finance such a venture? Were any of the >>Earl's a Baptist? >> Sometime a pastor will be linked with the building because he was the >>driving force to get it done. Or it could be that a Sinclair was chairman >>of the Deacon Board or it could be that a Sinclair was one of the founding >>members. Probably it never meant that one person built it himself (I know >>you didn't say that). So I just wonder what the story would be about this >>event? >>Laurel >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jean Haddow <jean@hadpad.demon.co.uk> >>To: sinclair@jump.net <sinclair@jump.net> >>Date: Saturday, May 15, 1999 7:50 AM >>Subject: Re: Baptist Religion--A hint? >No - the church was not named "first" as you do - we don't have that >tradition in Scotland. I can assure that it was the first Baptist >church to be founded in Scotland. It was built by a local landowner, >Sir William Sinclair. He did have enough money to build the church >although in later years he got into financial difficulties and lost much >of his land. The church is still there and still in use, my >grandparents worshipped there. The church is Keiss baptist church, >Keiss being the name of the village where it is located. I can assure >you I have got its origins right because of my close family connections >with it and because a friend of mine who is a Baptist minister and a >well respected church historian (PhD from St Andrew's University) did >the research.. >> >> >>> >>>In message <2373c94.36f6ccd2@aol.com>, Plumpett@aol.com writes >>>> >>>>I have read recently that a Sinclair built the first Baptist Church in >>>>northern Scotland ! >>>> >>>>Since the first article on this site that raised the Baptist question >>>>occurred several days later , I didn't note the specific details for later >>>>reference. >>>> >>>>To address the inquiry that first raised this issue , it would seem >>consistent >>>>with this finding that a specific religious affiliation could provide a >>>>valuable clue in finding roots in a family line . >>>> >>>>I would confirm other list member's comments that the religious >>affiliations >>>>were often fluid in this country . My own Sinclair line in the USA was >>first >>>>found to be >>>>Methodist- Episcopal , then Episcopal . >>>> >>>>A daughter then married into a line with Quaker , Baptist and Presbyterian >>>>member ! >>>> >>>>Joe Greigg >>>> >>>>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net. >>>>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html >>> >>>It is very difficult to reply from a Scottish perspective I am not sure >>>what you mean by fluid - the major change came at the REFORMATION - when >>>the forces of protestantism came to be dominant in Britain as a whole >>>and Henry the Eighth renounced his catholic faith and became head of the >>>Church of England. Now, there were splits within the Protestant >>>teaching and from that came such groupf as the Baptists, the >>>Congregationalists ets. >>>I've learnt in the time of being part of the Sinclair network that >>>direct. existing contacts with people in Scotland are of comparatively >>>little interest. I can understand this since we are so remote and >>>possibly so few in number and our more dirsct links with the past >>>history of the Sinclairs and with present possible family links in the >>>States and canada etc. are difficult to establish. >>>Anyway I think I'll ubsubscribe for now since most folks find Scotland >>>and its denizens just a tad remote. >>> >>>-- >>>Jean Haddow >>>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net. >>>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html >>> >> >>[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net. >>[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html > >-- >Jean Haddow >[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net. >[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html > [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net. [ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html