| 
 Again, Nine, beautifully written.  Your 
writing has indeed touched a responsive chord again. Symbolism is something that 
I hold very dearly and enjoy thoroughly.  This is another reason I want to 
see Roslyn.  I hold your view about history,  and reality for that 
matter.  If history isn't true,  then how can man have a true sense of 
reality at the present?  We have to follow our feelings and intuition to 
seek the truth,  and seek out those with a like mind that can help us. We 
are doing so many things wrongly, from our technology, to entire culture.  
Especially our education.  
  
On an aside note,  I presently have a young 
Scot (24 years old)  staying with us.  He is from the Glasgow region 
and plays with a British soccer  team. He is here to teach our children how 
to play the game better. He will be with us for 4 days. I hope to learn much 
from him.  I am currently on vacation,  but I still go in to work for 
meetings and business.  I am currently working with a man from Yorkshire 
who inspects large power plants ( I manage a large power plant).  My 
utility is associated with Northern Electric in Yorkshire.  We are 
subsidiaries of a large global utility. So, I am learning as much as I can about 
Scotland and England this week while I have the opportunity. 
  
I thoroughly enjoy the Sinclair mailing 
list.  Sometimes when I am busy,  I cannot view the mail as often as I 
prefer.  Yesterday I had 85 messages to view.  I scan them 
carefully,  if I don't,  I may miss wonderful messages such as 
yours.  But then,  I watch for your name and several others very 
carefully.  
  
I am very interested in the esoteric, as I feel 
I have a special appreciation and understanding of various aspects.  I am 
very interested in the Templars,   Scottish Rite etc..   We 
do not have very active Templar of Scottish Rite groups near us,  and I am 
not a member myself  largely due to that.  I would be interested in 
joining such a group if circumstances made it easier.  I depend on 
infrequent discussions and literature.  This web site is helping me greatly 
in that respect as well as with geneology.       
 
    Dear Paul,
  It is good to know I've been able to 
    touch a chord with you; that we are on the same wavelength. Words are 
    only pale shadows of the things they represent and this is particularly the 
    case whenever one has  to delve into the spiritual dimension of Man or in 
    trying to explain the esoteric; the symbolism of heraldry or the meaning 
    of the myriad of carvings within Rosslyn Chapel.  These things can be 
    felt rather than explained.
  At a time when books could be banned 
    or burned Earl William Sinclair wanted to leave a message 
    for posterity.  He had this chiselled out in stone in Rosslyn 
    Chapel.  We have still to find the key - the Rosetta stone - which 
    will allow us to decipher the symbolism which appears on each side of the 
    hundreds of cusps or cubes which hang  from the underside of the 
    various arches.  Experts cracked the runes of the Vikings, the ogham 
    of the Celts, the hieroglyphics of the Egyptians.  It is to be hoped 
    that someone will realise the importance of the symbolism of Rosslyn and 
    address the need for its 'interpretation' with due urgency.  Alas, at 
    the moment, there is no interest being shown.  I am reminded of the 
    following lines:
  The notice reads: "Do not pluck these 
    blossoms" But it is useless Against a wind that cannot 
    read.
  For 'wind' read 'academics' because, with a few notable 
    exceptions, they would rather live in everlasting ignorance than face the 
    prospect of having to change a single line of their stereotyped 
    teaching.
  At Rosslyn, I unearthed the oldest known 'floor' in 
    Midlothian.  I was ordered to cover it up again although I had 
    only 'scratched the surface'  of what could have been a major find 
    going back to Roman times.  
  The official line seems to 
    be: "On no account must history be re-written".  Children 
    are still being taught (in Scottish schools, as elsewhere) 
    that "Christopher Columbus discovered America" although he 
    never set foot on the Continent of North America; never claimed to have 
    done so because he went to his grave still believing that he had reached the 
    Indies - hence we call a place the West Indies which has nothing to do 
    with the Indies and we call people "Indians" who are NOT 
    Indians.
  Similarily, we are told that Speke (1827-1864) 'discovered' 
    the source of the Nile although Ptolemy (A.D. 90 - 168) had already drawn 
    a map showing the Nile rising from two lakes in Central Africa.  A book 
    in my possession (published in 1990) still tells us that Speke 
    'discovered' the source of the Nile.  I know differently.  I, too, 
    have travelled the whole length of the River Nile but, before doing so, I 
    researched its history - factual and mythological.
  One could go on 
    and on about the regurgitation of historical untruths long after these 
    untruths have been laid to rest in the light of 'so-called fresh 
    discoveries' which, on examination, have been known for countless 
    centuries.
  All this may seem to be something of a digression.  
    My aim is to demonstarte that we often hold (however 
    inadvertently) preconceived ideas about ourselves and about our 
    history.  Ameriacn history did not begin with the Declaration 
    of Independence or even with the Pilgrim Fathers.  The cultural 
    diffusiuon between the old World and the new has been going on for 
    thousands of years just as the history of the Sinclairs goes back thousands 
    of years i.e. long before we 'assumed' the name of St Clair.  In 
    writing to King John of Denmark, Henry, Lord Sinclair wrote on the 12th 
    July,1507 "...even in relation to the Earldom of Orkney and 
    Hietland (Shetland) which lands for certain service to be done to 
    the kings of Norway were alienated heritably to my progenitors even 
    before the birth of Christ"
  Elsewhere we are told: 
    "No family in Europe beneath the rank of royalty boasts a higher 
    antiquity, a nobler illustration or a more romantic interest than that of 
    St Clair"
  And from "The St Clairs of England" we 
    read: "The hill of Danbury, Essex , by the Thames, beneath London, 
    is a landmark and a tower to this lineage, as it has been for ages to the 
    World's greatest city, and its chapel will always stand fixed to memory 
    as something notable that has been".
  It goes on: 
    "All that was highest in marriage, lands and office they had in England 
    for nearly a Century after the Conquest, and the glow of their fame  
    and their physical and intellectual powers  kept them high for 
    centuries afterwards in a way rare to any one particular 
    lineage".
  All of this may seem to be a bit over the top but 
    when one finds a Professor at the Moscow State University stating 
    that the Sinclairs were one of the two most important families in Europe 
    you have a truly objective opinion from a truly independent source 
    untainted by the need to butter anyone up!
  In reply to your query 
    about my visit to the United States: that will be centred on 
    Massachusetts.
  Niven Sinclair
 
 
     [ This is the 
    Sinclair family discussion list, sinclair@jump.net. [ To get off or on the 
    list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html  
 |