[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I "found" the List about 3 years ago and have learned
so much and been entertained so much that I don't know
what I'd do without it. To my mind, there are 4
absolutely indispensable people contributing to the
List: John Q., the "father" of the List, Niven as the
fount of all Sinclair knowledge, Privateers for his
myriad and erudite contributions and Rob for his
wonderful commentary. We haven't heard from Rob in a
long time and he is sorely missed. Must we lose
Privateers, too? Isn't there something we could do to
persuade his return to the fold? Perhaps some sort of
I, too, vote for #2. I also think the suggestion that
full names be required is a good one. That should put
a stop to the 'poison pens' that prefer to remain
--- "Gary M. Sinclair, Harwich, Ma. USA"
> Greetings all,
> List friction is an unavoidable by product of a
> discussion list like this or
> any other. The mark of a Man or Woman is the
> ability to sort the
> information you search for from the information or
> messages you do not need.
> Our cousin Privateers, has left the list. His
> information has been an
> invaluable source to me and I will miss his
> As for a vote, I vote for #2 also and add that all
> list members must
> subscribe with a name as well as an E mail address
> and I will continue to
> assist in any way I can.
> My regards to you all, and my public thanks to
> Privateers for the knowledge
> imparted to me.
> Yours Aye,
> Gary M. Sinclair
> [ This is the Sinclair family discussion list,
> [ To get off or on the list, see
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages with Yahoo! Messenger.
[ This is the Sinclair family discussion list, firstname.lastname@example.org
[ To get off or on the list, see http://www.mids.org/sinclair/list.html